"Ideas are cheap. Execution is everything - and a non-technical founder recruiting a senior engineer for equity is a red flag."
Totally fair.
Why I ask:
I’m 23 and non-technical. For ~3 years I’ve been studying distributed systems, developer tooling, AI codegen, and an infra concept around intent-based architecture.
I’ve attempted three startups in the past 18 months. All failed at execution because the system I’m trying to build is deeply technical, and I know enough to know I can’t “vibe code” my way into it.
That creates a catch-22:
- Building a shallow version invalidates the thesis. - Building it correctly requires engineers far stronger than me. - Engineers strong enough to build it are rightly skeptical of someone like me.
So here’s my question - the thing I feel most self-imprisoned in:
How do I, as a young non-technical founder, pitch this to deep-tech, systems-level engineers without sounding like a naive "idea guy"? What should I be doing right now to make myself undeniably useful to a technical co-founder of this caliber?
I truly appreciate any insight and am entrusted with any feedback you give.
Thank you much -Tim
That something can be money, or connections, or prospective customers.
You need to be asking yourself how you can make that happen. Sales is one way. Delivering investors is another. If you have your own money, spend it on the team. Because at the end of the day, you either deliver product or you deliver cash. If all you deliver is the idea, then expecting engineers to build it for free is unreasonable.
Just say you've been talking to AI, if that's what you've done. It feels highly unlikely that you've studied developer tooling for 3 years and struggle to implement your own tools.
This sounds like a lack of "founder-product fit". Why should you be the one to build this thing if you have little domain knowledge? Maybe you should tackle a different domain where you have more knowledge (or could build knowledge quickly).